
On the page below you can find links to documents, reports, publications and discussions provided by Shevlin Smith.
The documents below are available to the public so that they can gain a better understanding of the legal challenges facing them, and why an experienced attorney is so important for success.
Contact us for a consultation today.
This study was published in August, 2006 based upon data collected by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMSCA). It was the first national study that determined the reasons and associated factors contributing to serious large-truck crashes.
Since 1983, <i>Best Lawyers</i> has compiled lists of outstanding attorneys by conducting exhaustive peer-review surveys in which thousands of leading lawyers confidentially evaluate their professional peers. The newest edition, <i>The Best Lawyers in America </i>(2008), is based on more than two million detailed evaluations of lawyers by other lawyers. Because lawyers are not required or allowed to pay a fee to be included, a listing in <i>Best Lawyers </i>is widely regarded within the legal profession as a signal honor, conferred on a lawyer by his or her peers. For 25 years, Best Lawyers lists have earned the respect of the profession, the media, and the public, as the most reliable, unbiased source of legal referrals anywhere.
Virginia Lawyers Weekly recognizes Brian Shevlin and Michael Shevlin for 11th largest verdict in the State of Virginia in 2006. It was the 4th largest verdict involving a Virignia medical malpractice case.
Virginia Lawyer's Weekly recognizes Michael Shevlin and Brian Shevlin for receiving the sixth largest jury verdict in the State of Virginia in 2005. This verdict was the second highest medical malpractice award in Virginia in 2005.
On October 1, 2007, Shevlin Smith moved its offices to its new location at 3975 University Drive, Suite 405, Fairfax, Virignia 22030. The office is conveniently located near the Fairfax County Courthouse and is block of the intersection of Route 123 and Route 236. Shevlin Smith's telephone number remains the same - (703)591-0067.
Tom Smith has again been named a Super Lawyer in the field of Plaintiff's Personal Injury:Medical Malpractice in Metro DC for 2008. He previously received this honor in 2007 in both Metro DC and Virginia. Other attorneys in Virginia nominate and vote for honorees, and only 5% of the attorneys in Virginia receive this designation.
Dr. John W. MacDonald and the Research Consortium of the Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation write about the significant advances in the understanding of spinal cord injuries and new approaches for the treatment of spinal cord injuries.
In Bostic v. About Women OB/GYN, the Virginia Supreme Court addressed the issue as to the foundational requirements for the introduction of medical literature pursuant to Virginia Code 8.01-401.1. The Bostic Court held that the trial court erroneously admitted medical literature, and reversed a jury verdict in favor of the defendant.
In Wright v. Minnicks, the Virginia Supreme Court reversed a trial court's decision to set aside a verdict in favor the plaintiff. The jury had awarded the plaintiff significant damages for loss of income, services, protection and assistance as a result of the decedent's death, but had awarded the plaintiff zero compensation for loss of solace damages. The Wright Court held that in light of evidence that showed the plaintiff's and decedent's marriage was failing, the jury's award of zero compensation for loss of solace damages was not inappropriate.
The Virginia Supreme Court upheld a jury's verdict in favor of mother's emotional distress claim arising from a birth injury to her son. The significance of this decision is that it recognizes that an injury suffered by a baby while in the mother's womb causes harm to both a mother and her child. As a result, both mother and child are permitted to recovery for their injuries and Virignia's statutory cap on damages will apply to the mother and child separately. Mother and child are each entitled each to recover an amount up to the cap.
In an era when plaintiffs and plaintiff's attorneys are routinely criticized for bringing frivolous lawsuits, a Fairfax County trial court judge held that a defense attorney for Ford Motor Company raised legal defenses that were without any factual support. The trial judge fined the defense attorney as a result. In the attached opinion, the Virginia Supreme Court agreed with trial court's decision.
This article is a summary of a large study conducted by Philip G. Peters, Jr., a professor of law at the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Law. Analyzing over a dozen studies from the last 25 years, Professor Peters refutes the claims that our legal system favors plaintiffs and that doctors and other health care providers are settling frivilous lawsuits to avoid trial.
Recognizing that "to err is human" this report from The Quality of Health Care in America Committee of the Institute of Medicine examined the widespread nature of preventable errors in the United States. Such errors lead to the unnecessary deaths of as many as 98,000 Americans each year. This report sets forth recommendations that will help improve our country's health care system.
This study conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health was published in the New England Journal of Medicine, one of the most prestigious journals in the medical profession. The study examined the current debate over tort reform, specifically the issue of whether the frivolous litigation is common and costly in the medical malpractice system. Its findings: "portraits of a malpractice system is stricken with frivolous litigation are overblown" and "the malpractice sytem performs reasonably well in its function of separating claims without merit from those with merit and comensating the latter."
Let Us Help You
Shevlin Smith
3975 University Drive, Suite 405
Fairfax, VA 22030
Phone: (703) 591-0067
Fax: (703) 591-1877